'Is drug testing an unwarranted invasion of employee privacy Essay\r'

'1. Is medicate interrogation an unwarranted usurpation of employee privacy? Applying for a job heart and soul that you are in conform to the rules and formula of the comp either where you are applying. one time you withstand been accepted, part of that is the medical examination including the drug trialing. If you are physically and medically fit, so you are rentd. So, the question regarding unwarranted invasion of employee privacy is not relevant in this situation. You need the job so you affirm to submit yourself to the requirements of the corporation regarding drug testing.\r\nSo, it subject matter to say, that the employer has the proper(a)s to know the result of the drug testing for them to be able to qualify their employees for any promotion or acceptance to the company. 2. Which is more importantâ€getting drugs out of the employment or protecting the privacy of the employee? Once the employee is positive on drugs, the stovepipe social occasion is to elim inate or terminate the employee instead than having the employee on the workplace. As the saying goes, in one case there is a rotten social function in a certain place, in the long run it will get hold of all the things in that place rotten.\r\nSo, the best thing and the most important are to get the drugs out of the workplace quite than protecting the privacy of the employee. tho sagacity the employee as drug dependent it has to be supported by documents stating that the employee is positive on drugs. 3. What about other health-threatening activities, i. e. smoking exterior of working hours, unprotected sex, etc. †With the examples generaten, it is already outside the working hours of the employee and the company has no more control over those activities.\r\nAn singleistic right of the person has to be considered in this matter. It is his/her prerogative to do those activities that will assemble his/her needs as long as it will not affect his/her exploit on his/her job. But once, the work is stirred because of those health-threatening activities then I should say that the exclusive’s attention must be called or the company whitethorn give sanction regarding those offenses the employee may commit. The employee has the right to spot between the right and the wrong depends on what is best for him/her. 4.\r\nShould employers be allowed to use polygraph tests to â€Å" overwhelm” out potentially costly employees who may engage in any of these activities? For the company’s benefit, the use of polygraph test to screenland out potentially costly employee who may engage in those activities can be allowed. Using the polygraph tests will be of not bad(p) expense on the part of the employer and the employee. though it may give a large benefit on the part of the employer by screening the employees that they are going to hire and they are sure that the person who passed the polygraph test are people who can be trusted and will b e an summation to the company.\r\nBut the thing is, are the employees will to submit themselves on the polygraph testing? An individual right again says that an individual has the right to refuse any test that has to be done to them. So, when they refuse, the employer can’t do anything about it but to agree with the employee. But if it is a company’s insurance then the employee has to make a quality whether to reside or not to continue in applying in the said company.\r\n'