The Crucible by Nicholas Hytner :: Movie Review, Film

This captivating screen version of The Crucible is based on Arthur Miller’s play in 1953. Nicholas Hytner did an excellent job at directing this movie. There are a few faults in the film, but overall it was a wonderful movie. The first fault in the movie was the beginning scene. The scene was supposed to be a night scene. But it looks as if it was early morning. I think Hytner shot the scene during the day and tried to use the night vision but it did not work so well. Another bad scene was when the girls are supposed to faint in the courtroom. The scene was poorly directed and acted. Bob Crowley did a great job with the designing of the costumes. They completely fit with the scenery and the setting. The music was also a plus with this film. It always fit in every scene. The base drumbeats were timed just right in the scene when Elizabeth is questioned about John being an adulterer. Right when she gave her answer the drum went, â€Å"BOOOM!† The camera always seemed to be in just the right place at all times. The cameraman shot every angle perfectly. He caught every person’s reaction, such as in the scene when John admits to lechery with Abigail. First he catches Abigail’s reaction to John’s admittance of this, and then he also catches Reverend Parris’s reaction when the Judge is talking about the girls dancing in the woods. The lighting worked very well in Elizabeth’s scene with the judge. Right before she states her answer, Hytner makes the rain go away and the sun come out and across the back wall of the courtroom. It makes the audience think that something good is about to happen, as if she was going to tell the truth and all the trials were going to stop. One character that stuck out to me is Winona Ryder as Abigail. She has a look of lust. Her eyes show deep sexual passion every time she looks at John Proctor. Ryder’s looks are very intimidating. In the scene when she threatens the girls, not only does her threat, â€Å"†¦let anyone breathe a word or the edge of a word about the other things, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring with me a pointy reckoning that will shudder you.

Hamlet has been read by various critics as dramatically Essay

Revenge tragedy was a popular theme when Shakespeare began his play writing career. The central feature of each revenge play was a hero who sought to avenge a wrong in a society where the law was unreliable. â€Å"Hamlet† is usually described as a revenge tragedy. The revenge in Renaissance drama emerged as a dominant genre. By modifying material sources Shakespeare was able to take an unremarkable revenge story and make it into one with fundamental themes and problems of the Renaissance. The Renaissance is a vast cultural phenomenon that began in 15th century Italy with the recovery of the classical Greek and Latin texts that had been lost in the middle-ages. â€Å"Hamlet†, by Shakespeare, uses the traditional conventions which an Elizabethan audience would have expressed interest in because of their moral and social implications. Kyd’s best known play † The Spanish Tragedy† was the most influential tragedy of the Elizabethan period inspired by the tragedies of Seneca, both of which served up a rich diet of madness, melancholy and revenge. However â€Å"Hamlet† has outlived most revenge plays and is still immensely popular. Vengeance was forbidden in the Elizabethan era as it was thought unethical and sinful because it could consume a person, erasing within them any sense of moral justice. This thought preoccupies Hamlet for much of the play. An Elizabethan audience would have sympathised with Hamlet’s attitude towards revenge and the tension of having fundamental Christian beliefs about mercy contrasted with the human impulse for revenge. To kill a king or queen who was protected by the divine aura of kingship was seen as an act of treason. However vengeance was also seen as an honour which had to be satisfied. Although an Elizabethan audience would have had prevailing Christian beliefs about mercy juxtaposed with secular view points in tune with human impulse for revenge, a modern audience would empathise with â€Å"Hamlet† as a revenge hero due to the 20th century concept of the â€Å"just war† theory, which states that war can only take place under certain conditions e.g. when all forms of peaceful negotiations have failed. In â€Å"Hamlet† soliloquies are used to reveal Hamlet’s innermost thoughts reflecting his contemplative character, a convention that an Elizabethan audience would have understood. Hamlet’s melancholy is a leading factor throughout the play; his soliloquies give us a more in-depth perception as to what he is thinking. We can not read minds and in theatre, it is important for us to have this insight into the characters mind as away of understanding motivations. In Hamlet’s case, we are aware of this from the beginning. Hamlet is extremely distraught by the death of his father and the incestuous union of his mother and Claudius: â€Å"How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable Seems to me all the uses of the world! Fie on’t, ah fie, ’tis an unweeded garden† This statement is dramatic in that he is using the unweeded garden as a way of metaphorically speaking about our world that is full of ailment and repulsiveness as opposed to a weeded garden which would represent order and contentment. Although an Elizabethan audience would have accepted Hamlets hesitation, a modern audience would accept and understand the feelings expressed in Hamlet’s soliloquies. Hamlets passionate first soliloquy provides a striking contrast to the controlled dialogue he must exchange with Claudius and his court. The primary function of the soliloquy is to reveal to the audience Hamlet’s melancholy and despair at the time he is presenting the soliloquy. A modern audience would realise that Hamlet is â€Å"a mere Prince of Philosophical Speculators who would not feel at home in an incestuous tomb of politics†ithus delaying this actions to avenge his father’s death. William Hazlitt also states that Hamlet â€Å"is not a character marked by strength of will or even passion, but by refinement of thought and sentiment†i. This marks him out as â€Å"a misfit in a treacherous world†. The world in which Hamlet is living in is claustrophobic full of deception, spying and greed. Brannagh’s interpretation of â€Å"Hamlet† presents this idea effectively through the use of mirrors in the Great Hall, behind which people spy on one another. Hamlet himself notices that Elsinore is a prison rather than a sanction: â€Å"Denmark’s a prison world†¦ in which there are many confines Wards and dungeons†¦ † In a disjointed outpouring of disgust, anger, sorrow and grief, Hamlet explains that, without expectation, everything in the world is either futile or contemptible. His speech is saturated with suggestions of rot and corruption, as seen in the basic usage of words such as â€Å"rank† and â€Å"gross†, and the metaphor associating the world with â€Å"an unweeded garden†. The nature of the his grief is soon exposed, as we learn that his mother, Gertrude, has married her brother-in-law only two months after the death of Hamlet’s father, believing that her display of love was a pretense to satisfy her own lust and greed. Shakespeare employs the use of juxtaposition and contrast to enhance Hamlet’s feelings of contempt, disgust and inadequacy. Another juxtaposition in the soliloquy is Hamlet’s use of Hyperion and a satyr to denote his father and uncle, respectively. Hyperion, the Titan God of light, represents honor and virtue, all traits belonging to Hamlet’s father. Satyrs, the half-human and half-beast companions of the Wine-God Dionysus, represents lasciviousness and overindulgence, much like Hamlet’s uncle. It is therefore no wonder Hamlet develops disgust for Claudius. An important contrast in this soliloquy is seen in Hamlet’s self-depreciating comment; â€Å"But no more like my father Than I to Hercules† Hamlet’s comparison of himself to the courageous Greek hero indicates his developing lack of self worth, a theme focused upon in the second soliloquy. In addition to revealing Hamlet’s plot to catch the king in his guilt, Hamlet’s second soliloquy uncovers the essence of Hamlet’s true conflict. Hamlet is committed to seeking revenge for his father, yet he cannot act due to his revulsion towards extracting the cold and calculating revenge. Determined to convince himself to carry out the premeditated murder of his uncle, Hamlet works himself into a frenzy. He hopes that his passions will halt his better judgment and he will then be able to kill Claudius without hesitation. But Hamlet fails to quell his apprehensions and can not act immediately. The traditional revenge hero would be seen, by an Elizabethan audience, as one who sought to avenge a wrong in an unjust society. Hamlet reflects the Elizabethan views of revenge with his determined heart during the second soliloquy. The soliloquy leaves the reader feeling that Hamlet will keep his word and that revenge will certainly follow in the flowing act. However, Hamlet’s determination begins to deteriorate as the play progresses suggesting Hamlet’s ambivalence of avenging his father’s death, through phrases such as â€Å"o cursed spite that even I was born to set things right†. From this point onwards Hamlet fails to carry out the avenger’s role, which would have defied an Elizabethan audience’s tradition. Shakespeare intentionally defies the traditional conventions because he wants to show that Hamlet is different. However, Hamlet gains sympathy from the modern audience rather than loses sympathy because a modern audience might be more interested to consider how many uncertainties our lives are built upon and Hamlet’s psychological motivation. Unlike Hamlet’s first two major soliloquies, the third and most famous speech seems to be governed by reason and not frenzied emotion. Unable to do little but wait for completion of his plan to â€Å"catch the conscience of the king†, Hamlet sparks an internal philosophical debate on the advantages and disadvantages of existence, and whether it is one’s right to end his or her own life. Hamlet must find the appropriate analysis in his situation, however finds himself shifting back and forth between consideration of whether action or inaction is better. In terms of Hamlet’s analysis, the two issues are closely related. Yet, his words in Act 2 Scene 2 highlight his understanding that man’s nobility transcends the notion of revenge: â€Å"What a piece of work is man! How noble In reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express And admirable, in action†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ † He has a public obligation to do right by Denmark, but this should not be done morally unless it is done in good will. It can therefore be said that Hamlet’s deepening grief is blinding his sound judgment and fogging his path for acceptance of his misgiving. As a result Hamlet begins berating himself with words such as â€Å"ass† and â€Å"scullion†, for failing to carry out his duty as an avenger, even though he has real reasons for revenge. Hamlet is hypersensitive. Everything that has happened to him has made him intensely self-aware and ready to be self-critical. Although an Elizabethan audience would not have accepted Hamlet’s hesitation, a modern audience would accept and understand the feelings expressed in Hamlet’s soliloquies because hesitation is natural in humanity. The soliloquy ends with Hamlet planning to â€Å"Catch the conscience of the king† through a play. Thrilled that his scheme will help prove that Claudius killed his father, Hamlet experiences a sudden surge of confidence. The word â€Å"conscience† has more significance than it may seem. It can be read as a conflation of Hellenistic and Roman with Christian influences extending the apostle Paul into Shakespeare’s time. Going well beyond a guilty feeling, it points forwards and backwards providing guidance to action. Hamlet’s last soliloquy is crucial to our understanding of his character development. By the end of the soliloquy, Hamlet brings to a halt his solemn contemplation on the immoral act of murderous revenge, and finally accepts it as a necessary duty. It is not that Hamlet has presented a solid and reasonable argument to convince himself of his terrible responsibility: rather he has driven himself to the conclusion with intense and distorted thoughts. Hamlet accuses himself of forgetting his father in the â€Å"bestial oblivion†, yet he thinks his problem could be â€Å"thinking to precisely on the event†. More ever, although Hamlet has seen Fortinbras only a moment earlier in the play, and knows nothing of his true motives for going to war, Hamlet convinces himself that he is fighting to protect his honor. Part of Hamlet realizes the idea of such a conviction, however illogical and futile, he focuses on the image of Fortinbras courageously leading his troops. Hamlet’s reason, the part of him that has been dominant throughout the play; the part of him that questions the â€Å"honour† in murder and revenge, this time cannot provide a rebuttal. Hamlet is overcome by his obligations to enact revenge. Hamlet was once greatly distressed over having to exact payment for this father’s murder, even though the reason for such revenge was weighty. Now, Hamlet commends the idea of the â€Å"imminent death of twenty thousand men†. Laertes, Fortinbras and Hamlet are all sons seeking to avenge a wrong in an unjust society. Laertes displays an impulsive reaction when angered. Laertes’ imprudent actions are motivated by fury and frustration, giving little thought to action â€Å"I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father† This provides an insight into Laertes’ mind displaying his desire for revenge at any cost. In contrast, Hamlet looks for certainty, through contemplation, before taking action, seeking a right without tainting his mind. Likewise, Fortinbras is an obvious contrast to Hamlet, though his situation similar, as a man of action. Hamlet himself notices the contrast: â€Å"†¦ tender prince, whose spirit with divine ambition puffed Makes mouths at the invisible event†¦ † Laertes is fast to act. He wants to revenge and he wants it immediately. His actions are rushed, allowing the possibility of manipulation by Claudius. He cannot let his natural feelings rule his will. He only thinks about his consequences after he has performed. This is evident at the end of the play when he asks for Hamlet’s forgiveness when he says â€Å"I am justly killed with mine own treachery†. He is too willing to believe the king’s version of events, thus Claudius uses Laertes anger for his own benefit. Laertes only wants revenge and is not concerned with punishment. Shakespeare makes these contrasts to highlight Hamlet as a stereotypical â€Å"weak avenger†, but an infinitely more interesting and complex character consumed by the moral complications of revenge, which reveal him as a hero blesses or cursed by the power of individual thought as opposed to a hero who follows unthinkingly the revenge tradition. An Elizabethan audience would see â€Å"Hamlet† as a weak avenger with a â€Å"fatal flaw† and a propensity to think too much, therefore not keeping within the dramatic conventions, which would have been greatly appreciated by an Elizabethan audience. However, a modern audience may sympathise greatly with Hamlet’s inability to abandon or fulfill his role because making an epic decision is rarely straightforward. It seems that Shakespeare wants to present Hamlet as a tortured soul, influenced by Christian beliefs. The dilemma â€Å"Hamlet† faces is in some ways the dilemma faced by civilized man at large, William Hazlitt supports this view by stating that â€Å"Hamlet is one of those plays that we think the most about because it reflects on human life†i. Bibliography – Hamlet: Cambridge School – Shakespeare & criticism : F. E. Haliday – Characters in Shakespeare’s play- Hamlet: William Hazlitt

Movie Review Girl Interrupted - 1957 Words

Introduction-What is the disorder The movie I have chosen to do my psychological film disorder assignment on is Girl Interrupted which is a psychological drama directed by James Mangold. The movie takes place in a mental institution for troubled women. All of the characters in this movie suffer from one or more mental illnesses such as depression, borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia. The movie gives us an inside look on how poorly these women are being treated and how they are treated as if they are abnormal because they are in this institution. Similarly the women are faced with their own personal and outer issues within the institution. The director gives us an inside look on how the patients are being treated poorly are†¦show more content†¦This person may also have a come and go attitude which is what we discussed in class as someone who is social and quickly becomes anti social because they do not know what they truly want or they simply do not know how to interact with certain individuals or how to react in situations. Many people who suffer from this disorder may have suicidal thoughts, bi-polar disorder and also depression .Upon her arrival at the institution she meets some of the patients who she quickly starts to connect and develop a bond with especially with one of the patients named Lisa who is diagnosed as a sociopath. Psychiatrists and psychologists states that a sociopath is someone with a personality disorder who â€Å"displays antisocial tendencies that are ascribed to social or environmental factors.† Other definitions include â€Å"A pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood.† (Dr.Axe, 2017). With this being said anyone could suffer from a personality disorder and majority of the time it goes unnoticed because we end up blaming other people for the way we feel or react to certain situations. As the movie goes on we are introduced to another woman named Daisy she suffered from compulsive eating disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder and also self harm. Why are the patients diagnosed with these disorders? Therefore the character I haveShow MoreRelatedMovie Review: Girl, Interrupted835 Words   |  4 PagesThe movie Girl, Interrupted is based on the book Girl, Interrupted, by Susanna Kaysen. I would like to say that it is loosely based because although the actress, Winona Ryder, does portray Kaysen’s borderline personality, it seems that Angelina Jolie, who is Lisa Rowe in the movie, steals the spotlight. Girl, Interrupted is about a young girl who is put into the mental ward after an attempted suicide which she claims she was basically trying to leave a lot of stress she had from various experiencesRead MorePsychological Analysis of Girl Interupted Essay990 Words   |  4 PagesRunning Head: BPD in Girl Interrupted Borderline Personality Disorder in Girl Interrupted Girl Interrupted is a movie based on Susanna Kaysen’s novel, which was inspired by her stay in a mental institution in the 1960s. Incidentally the main character, played by Winona Ryder, is named Susanna. She is eighteen years old and begins the movie by reflecting back on the events leading up to her visit to the psychologist. She has just graduated from high school and other than being an aspiringRead MoreScience in the Media835 Words   |  3 Pagesâ€Å"Science in the Media† Project In the movie Back to the Future part II, Dock goes to Marty’s house and parks his flying car in Marty’s driveway. Just before they leave to head off into the future, Doc rummages through Marty’s trash. In there he finds waded up paper bags, a banana peel, and a partially filled beer can. Doc then inserts the trash that he finds into the top of the engine component of his flying car. Immediately after doing so, they hover off into the future. This particular scene inRead MoreTaking a Look at the Movie Godzilla909 Words   |  4 Pages â€Å"Godzilla† Review Essay I like movies with a strong female lead. A girl that defies all limits and proves herself to be just as worthy as any man. That being said, I was a tad wary about seeing the new â€Å"Godzilla† movie. The only reason I went was because my boyfriend was very excited to see it and being the dutiful girlfriend I am, I went along with an open mind. My expectations were quite low, since this movie didn’t fit in with my usual genre. I never anticipated to actually like the film. â€Å"Godzilla†Read MoreA Comparison of Two Film Adaptations of Hamlet Essay741 Words   |  3 Pages I was raped, the girl said to me overtaken with tears. I was taken by surprise and was at a complete loss for words. She had just taken one of the darkest secrets of her life and brought it out to the splendid light for just me to gaze upon. A little apprehensive, I responded, Im sorry. What is one to say at the revelation of such a horrid thing? Anything else I thought of saying sounded stu pid and insensitive, so I opted for silence and hugged her to comfort her to the best of my abilityRead MorePersonal Narrative : Palate Dreams 1017 Words   |  5 Pagesthing I noticed. Neither was he Japanese. He did not have those typical features. I did not dare ask him such a thing. He walked with me and to my happiness appreciated every review I gave with a piece of advice for each one of it without my asking. He was 55 year old and still had such spirit inside him like of 19 year girl. I could not believe I was having a session with him and not even the fact that he agreed to come to a event like this which was nothing but a peanut when it comes to his likesRead MoreThe Crucible, Directed By Nicholas Hytner Essay2664 Words   |  11 PagesThe movie I chose to research was The Crucible, directed by Nicholas Hytner but written by Arthur Miller. This film starred a young Wynona Ryder along with Daniel day-Lewis and Paul Scofield. Originally released on November 27th 1996, the film was well received even being nominated for an Oscar in 1997, along with 26 additional academy awards that year, sadly it only won 4. Of course a film about witchcraft, an affair, and people being hanged would spark controversy especially since it was ratedRead MoreThe Crucible By Nicholas Hytner Essay2598 Words   |  11 Pages The movie I chose to research was the crucible, directed by Nicholas Hytner but written by Arthur Miller. This film starred a young Wynona Ryder along with Daniel d ay-Lewis and Paul Scofield. Originally released on November 27th 1996, the film was well received even being nominated for an Oscar in 1997, along with 26 additional academy awards that year, sadly it only won 4. Of course a film about witchcraft, an affair, and people being hanged would spark controversy especially since it was ratedRead MoreMary and Max9879 Words   |  40 PagesMary and Max It is 1976, an 8-year-old Mary Daisy Dinkle (Bethany Whitmore) is a lonely little girl living in Mount Waverley, Melbourne, Australia. Her relatively poor family cannot afford to buy her toys or nice clothing, and she is teased by children at her school due to an unfortunate birthmark on her forehead. Her father is distant and her alcoholic, kleptomaniac mother provides no support. The closest thing she has to a friend is the man for whom Mary collects mail, Len Hislop, a World WarRead MoreThe Movie In A Grove By Akira Kurosawa1923 Words   |  8 PagesThe woodcutter confirms Tajomaru’s story, but describes the battle as â€Å"much more pitiful† than originally described. After the woodcutter, priest, and commoner finish discussing what happened between Tajomaru, the samurai, and his wife, they are interrupted by the cries of a baby that has been abandoned with a kimono and an amulet. The commoner steals the kimono and amulet from the baby, but the woodcutter decide s to take the baby and care for his as his own. The story told in Rashomon is quite simple;